CITE-ITEL A dialogical synthesis of research into initial literacy teacher preparation
Login

Supporting dialogically organized instruction in an English teacher preparation program: A video-based, Web 2.0-mediated response and revision pedagogy

Abstract

Background/Context: This paper theorizes and describes a program-wide pedagogical design for teacher preparation that addresses central problems related to supporting beginning teacher candidates in designing engaging classroom interactions in and across diverse contexts.

Focus of Study: In particular, we aimed to support the development of dialogically-organized classroom interactions over time through a pedagogy informed by Multiliteracies. Our pedagogy involved a Web 2.0-mediated process of Video-Based Response and Revision (VBRR), developed and implemented over two years with secondary English teacher candidates at Michigan State University engaged in fifth-year internships in local secondary schools.

Project Design: Four times over the course of their year-long internships, teacher candidates recorded video of their teaching, posted clips and other related materials to an online social network, commented on each others’ practices, and reflected on how they might implement the feedback they received from their peers and instructors. In addition, they created an endofyear “digital reflection” drawing on all of these materials.

Conclusions/ Recommendations: Based upon analysis of teacher candidates’ moves within the structure of the pedagogical design, we present pedagogical and programmatic considerations for teacher educators interested in designing learning environments that make beginning teacher practices visible in networked spaces, that invite collaborative responses to those practices, and that create opportunities for transformed practices.

Reference

  • Juzwik, M., Sherry, M., Caughlan, S., Heintz, A., Borsheim-Black. (2012). Supporting dialogically organized instruction in an English teacher preparation program: A video-based, Web 2.0-mediated response and revision pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 114(3), 1-42.

Journal

Teachers College Record

Analysis

Is this article part of a larger project or series of studies?

unclear

Does this study draw on a large, preexisting data set?

no

Research Approach

  • Design Development
  • none stated
  • Qualitiative

Geographic Setting

  • Michigan State University

Institutional Context

  • University based

Certification Level

  • Secondary

Programatic Focus

  • English

Research Location Context

  • University

Preservice Participants

  • Undergraduates (university based program)

Preservice Sample Size

Other Participant Data

  • Teacher Educators
  • University Professor

Duration of Data Collection

  • 2 years

Data Sources

  • student reflections
  • student work
  • Transcriptions
  • Video
  • written feedback sheets
  • written reflections/class papers

Data Analysis Tools

  • no analysis stated

Researcher Positionality

Research Questions

Purpose: Our project set out to overcome some of the challenges facing teacher educators who wish to support TCs’ development of diverse dialogic approaches to structuring classroom interaction using a web-based tool - Video Based Response and Revision (web 2.0 mediated process)
Is this research question explicit from the manuscript? No

Categories

1TEP Category: Teacher educator practices.

2PTP Category: Preservice teachers teaching practices (including shifts in teaching practices as a function of growth or context).

3CCE Category: Course experiences – the work that is done in a course to promote the content.

7DDA Topic: Discussion/Dialogic approaches

7RES: Research

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

© 2015–2026 The University of Texas at Austin
Supported by the Office of Instructional Innovation
Web Privacy Policy | Web Accessibility Policy | Contact

The University of Texas at Austin College of Education

The Literacy Research Association provided pilot funding for portions of this project.

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply
wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply